In the picture below you can see my excel chart. The problem is that Training Stress Score, calculated with power, is significantly smaller and therefore the zones are in a faulty ratio. Then I reasoned that it might be because of yours using TRIMP if no power meter is available. ![]() If its cycling, then power works.Įver since you added the Training Stress Balance zones recommended by Joe Friel … over at TrainingPeaks they seemed a bit off to me, especially compared to his charts. For running, if I have pace, that’s fine. Then I combine it with some objective measure. In my personal case, I use TRIMP & s-RPE scores which form two subjective measures of training load. For most people, this is already taking things too far.ītw, I don’t really know where the HR Load estimation methodology comes from. Something like that can be programmed using Golden Cheetah. If you need more sensitive metric, you may need an individualized TRIMP solution based on your own blood lactate rise with intensity. Dependencies are exponents where co-efficients for males and females come out of a paper I referenced earlier, plus its also dependent on the resting heart rate in your settings. Understand the differences in the math.īannister’s TRIMP is a pretty well studied metric. ![]() ![]() I wouldn’t get too hung up on comparing the precision of Load and Bannister’s TRIMP.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |